Oliver Wendell Holmes is considered to be a transcendentalist like Emerson who has strong ties to Carlyle and therefore the Goethe Illuminati of Weishaupt. His thoughts which are included in the following quote are not as bad as they might, virginia Crime, seem and I personally think there is merit in abortion and other forms of eugenics if done for the ‘Greater Good’.
“Beginning in 1907, with legislation passed in Indiana, forced sterilization on the basis of eugenic doctrine began spreading across the United States, with finally thirty states having such laws on the books.

In this century, upwards of 50,000 Americans have been sterilized by order of the state. {Today we have drugs that reduce the libido or sex drive and potency of the less fortunate and victimized masses. These drugs and lobotomies which are still performed in Canada serve the same purposes.} The constitutionality of such compulsion was upheld in 1927, when the case Buck vs. Bell went before the Supreme Court. With only one dissent, the court said, in a majority opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:
‘It is better for the world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.

The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.’
The court, in other words, went beyond saying that a person is guilty until proven innocent; it declared that hypothetical persons were presumed guilty of criminal intent even before being conceived and may not be brought into existence. The 1927 decision has never been overturned, and is still a part of the law of the land.
After World War II, German lawyers defending those accused of being, virginia Crime, Nazi war criminals for having forcibly sterilized two million people as a part of Nazi racial doctrine pointed to the sterilization laws in America and the 1927 Supreme Court decision as justification for their clients’ conduct.

In his recent book, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and National Socialism, Stefan K?hl traces the relationships between the Nazi racial theorists and members of the American eugenics movement in the 1930s. American eugenicists and German advocates of “racial hygiene” were already communicating and sharing ‘’scientific” information before the First World War. The conflict in Europe, and particularly American entry into the war against Germany, broke off all such ties. But shortly after the war’s end, contacts began to reemerge, with their American colleagues being especially helpful in getting German eugenicists accepted back into their community of scholars.

Throughout the 1920s, the German proponents of racial sterilization drew upon the arguments of their American counterparts, using data the American eugenicists had collected to justify the case for distinguishing between “superior” and “inferior” racial types; they also made, virginia Crime, the case that America was more enlightened and progressive in its racial policies, since numerous American states had passed sterilization laws, while German law was “backward” in its narrow defense of individual rights that frustrated equivalent German legislation.

With Hitler’s coming to power in 1933, Germany’s racial hygienists came into their own, with institutes for race science and research being established or expanded. They solicited articles by many of the leading American eugenicists for their “scholarly” journals, translated many of their works into German, and gave them wide distribution. The Nazis used these American books and articles to demonstrate that they were not alone in the world in advocating compulsory racial improvement and purity.

A number of American eugenicists happily, virginia Crime, cooperated. Harry L. Laughlin, who authored the “model” sterilization law for Virginia that was then copied by several other states, saw his proposals explicitly implemented in Germany’s 1933 Hereditary Health Law,, virginia Crime, that prohibited racial intermarriage and codified forced sterilization in the new Germany. As a tribute, the University of Heidelberg awarded Laughlin an honorary degree in 1936, which he enthusiastically accepted.

Even in the late 1930s and early 1940s, some American eugenics publications refused to criticize Nazi race policy in general or legal persecution of the Jews in particular. Some of the leading eugenicists argued that to do so would be to unjustifiably mix science with politics.” (5)
The leader of the House Un-American Activities lynching was John Stennis who kept the real Holocaust(s) alive in his words ‘They Killed our Savior’ long after Nuremberg where the Nazis were not allowed to mount certain Synarchy defenses that might have educated the world about the truth of what happened in Germany (and Russia).

Most Jews do not know their origin and often they too are abusive of other Jews like the Khazars.
Author, Columnist and activist – hermit

Rothschild versus Lincoln:

Pierre Belmont and Judah Benjamin are most interesting studies in the matter of the War Between the States. Belmont was Democratic National Chairman and very much the Rothschild operative as he reported through Salomon Rothschild.

“The election of Abraham Lincoln in November 1860 was seen by Salomon as merely one step closer to the abyss, and he had nothing but contempt for the new President.

? he is not up to his position and the Republicans themselves regret having nominated him.

He rejects all forms of compromise and thinks only of repression by force of arms. He has the appearance of a peasant and can only tell bar-room stories. The other day I saw one of his supporters, who had been to see him at Springfield to chat with him about the situation. He found him seated, legs on the mantelpiece, in shirtsleeves, hat on his head, amusing himself by spitting great gobs of tobacco juice that he extracted from his quid. After conversation which shed no light on the way Mr. Lincoln viewed things, the visitor – who is one of the Republican leaders – went away very disappointed in the future president.

In this country, people do not take umbrage at nonentities; the greatest claim to public favour is to be unknown.” (1)

Belmont was not in agreement with Salomon as regards the maintaining of the Union and he went over his head to the other Rothschilds in Europe. The full extent of their ability to play both ends against the middle seems largely unconsidered by most historians. The same was true when they were being ousted by converted Jews and the P?reires in the time of Napoleon. The same is true today but you will have to read all my books and many of the source material to get to the point where you can be sure this, virginia Crime, is at least partially true.

“Up until the mid-century the Rothschilds entrusted to agents their business in distant lands. There might be on-the-spot financiers or merchants, or trusted bank employees sent abroad after years at New Court or Rue Lafitte. Whoever they were, their positions carried enormous responsibility and prestige, as well as the potential for considerable personal profit.

Rothschilds were in the vanguard of overseas development. As new colonies were opened up in Africa, and the newly created nations of South America sought to expand their economies, the agents of the Paris or London house were there to buy up mining concessions, finance railway building or provide state loans.

They owned or had major shareholdings in Central American ironworks, North American canal construction companies and a multiplicity of other concerns. They became the major importers of bullion from the newly discovered goldfields; in 1855 the London band established its own gold refinery on Tower Hill, virginia Crime, in premises recently vacated by the Royal Mint.” (2)

Thus we must look to the Rockefellers and J. P. Morgan and the control of technology through General Electric and many other things which we have done.

My own comments on the Peking Man explorations are already too far from the normal perception of the man named Teilhard by even suggesting he was catering to his sponsor. But it would not be the first time that a person was attacked by such an organization (as he often was, and you can see in comments we have quoted from the Catholic Encyclopedia) in order to make a more credible spokesman and agent for their real cause. There is no good reason to further debate Teilhard except for the facts we are about to relay in reference to the Rockefeller Foundation.

The Yale connection and the Skull & Bones Society founded by a great Merovingian name (Russell) and the Opium Wars are all related as well. It would serve the reader well to wait and read before making decisions about these things.

“TRANSFORMATION OF THE ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION

Now a financial problem loomed. The Rockefeller Foundation grant that supported the digging would run out in April 1929. So in January Black, virginia Crime, wrote the directors, asking them to support the Zhoukoudian excavations by creating a Cenozoic Research Laboratory (the Cenozoic includes the periods from the Paleocene to the Holocene).

In April, Black received the funds he desired.

Just a few years before, Rockefeller Foundation officials had actively discouraged Black from becoming too involved in paleoanthropological research. Now they were backing him to the hilt, setting up an institute specifically devoted to searching for remains of fossil human ancestors {The religious tides were changing as their ‘Bible Narrative’ approach shepherded by Frederick T. Gates a prominent Baptist educator and founder of their Foundation was seen as less influential in bending minds than what is coming.

}. Why had the Rockefeller Foundation so changed its attitude toward Black and his work? This question bears looking into, because the financial contribution of foundations would turn out to be vital to human evolution research carried out by scientists like Black {The author of this quote is a historian who is not aware of the nature of the Skull & Bones Society or other Merovingian import.}. Foundation support would also prove important in broadcasting the news of the finds and their significance to the waiting world.

As Warren Weaver, a scientist and Rockefeller Foundation official, wrote in 1967: ‘In a perfect world an idea could be born, nourished, developed and made known to everyone, criticized and perfected, and put to good use without the crude fact of financial support ever entering in to the process. Seldom, if ever, in the practical world in which we live does this occur.’

For Weaver, biological questions were of the highest importance. He regarded the highly publicized particle accelerators and space explorations programs as something akin to scientific fads.

He added: ‘The opportunities not yet rigorously explored lie in the understanding, virginia Crime, of the nature of living things.’ It seemed clear in 1932, when the Rockefeller Foundation launched its quarter-century program in that area, that the biological and medical sciences were ready ‘for a friendly invasion by the physical sciences… the tools are now available for discovering, on the most disciplined and precise level of molecular actions, how man’s central nervous system really operates, how he thinks, learns, remembers, and forgets? Apart from the fascination of gaining some knowledge of the nature of the mind-brain-body relationship, the practical values in such studies are potentially enormous.

Only thus may we gain information about our behavior of the sort that can lead to wise and beneficial control.’

It thus became clear that at the same time the Rockefeller Foundation was channeling funds into human evolution research in China, it was in the process of developing an elaborate plan to fund biological research with a view to developing methods to effectively control human behavior.

Over the past few decades, science has developed a comprehensive cosmology that explains the origins of human beings as the culmination of a 4-billion year process {Make that 5 now} of chemical and biological evolution on this planet, which formed in the aftermath of the Big Bang, the event that marked the beginning of the universe, founded upon particle physics and astronomical observations suggesting we live in an expanding cosmos, is thus inextricably connected with the theory of the biochemical evolution of all life forms, including human beings.

The major foundations, especially the Rockefeller Foundation, provided key funding {Eli Lilly was a huge supporter of archaeology with hands-on experience in the Hopewell area.} for the initial research supporting this materialistic cosmology, which has for all practical purposes pushed God and the soul into the realm of mythology – at least in the intellectual centers of modern civilization.” (3)

A history of the Rockefeller/Rothschild connection back to the Benjaminites and up the founding of the Federal Reserve Board is a most intriguing study.

The key word is ‘intrigue’. We will have occasion to mention them some more but this particular insight seemed hard enough evidence of the things we speculate about with other evidence in the field of mind-control devices, Black Ops, the Opium War(s) and a great deal that everyone should know in order to try to make the future of their children as positive as possible. There is so much more I could include in this book but perhaps this is enough for now.

GERMAN LAW PROTECTED ‘RIGHTS’ MORE THAN US LAW:

It was not until after the Nuremberg Trials that the rest of the world put the kinds of protections in place that had already been in place for a long time in Germany but we are found accusing Germans of the heinous crimes we actually lead.

It is just like Mackenzie King in Canada who was backing Hitler and his programs in many areas, along with other blue bloods like the Bushes and their bosses the Merovingians.

“Beginning in 1907, with legislation passed in Indiana, forced sterilization on the basis of eugenic doctrine began spreading across the United States, with finally thirty states having such laws on the books. In this century, upwards of 50,000 Americans have been sterilized by order of the state. {Today we have drugs that reduce the libido or sex drive and potency of the less fortunate and victimized masses.

These drugs and lobotomies which are still performed in Canada serve the same purposes.} The constitutionality of such compulsion was upheld in 1927, when the case Buck vs. Bell went before the Supreme Court. With only one dissent, the court said, in a majority opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes:

‘It is better for the world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.

The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.’

The court, in other words, went beyond saying that a person is guilty until proven innocent; it declared that hypothetical persons were presumed guilty of criminal intent even before being conceived and may not be brought into existence. The 1927 decision has never been overturned, and is still a part of the law of the land.

After World War II, German lawyers defending those accused of being Nazi war criminals for having forcibly sterilized two million people as a part of Nazi racial doctrine pointed to the sterilization laws in America and the 1927 Supreme Court decision as justification for their clients’ conduct.

In his recent book, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and National Socialism, Stefan K?hl traces the relationships between the Nazi racial theorists and members of the American eugenics movement in the 1930s. American eugenicists and German advocates of “racial hygiene” were already communicating and sharing ‘’scientific” information before the First World War. The conflict in Europe, and particularly American entry into the war against Germany, broke off all such ties. But shortly after the war’s end, contacts began to reemerge, with their American colleagues being especially helpful in getting German eugenicists accepted back into their community of scholars.

Throughout the 1920s, the German proponents of racial sterilization drew upon the arguments of their American counterparts, using data the American eugenicists had collected to, virginia Crime, justify the case for distinguishing between “superior” and “inferior” racial types; they also made the case that America was more enlightened and progressive in its racial policies, since numerous American states had passed sterilization laws, while German law was “backward” in its narrow defense of individual rights that frustrated equivalent German legislation.

With Hitler’s coming to power in 1933, Germany’s racial hygienists came into their own, with institutes for race science and research being established or expanded. They solicited articles by many of the leading American eugenicists for their “scholarly” journals, translated many of their works into German, and gave them wide distribution. The Nazis used these American books and articles to demonstrate that they were not alone in the world in advocating compulsory racial improvement and purity.

A number of American eugenicists happily cooperated. Harry L. Laughlin, who authored the “model” sterilization law for Virginia that was then copied by several other states, saw his proposals explicitly implemented in Germany’s 1933 Hereditary Health Law, that prohibited racial intermarriage and codified forced sterilization in the new Germany. As a tribute, the University of Heidelberg awarded Laughlin an honorary degree in 1936, which he enthusiastically accepted.

Even in the late 1930s and early 1940s, some American eugenics publications refused to criticize Nazi race policy in general or legal persecution of the Jews in particular.

Some of the leading eugenicists argued that to do so would be to unjustifiably mix science with politics.” (4)

The leader of the House Un-American Activities lynching was John Stennis who kept the real Holocaust(s) alive in his words ‘They Killed our Savior’ long after Nuremberg where the Nazis were not allowed to mount certain Synarchy defenses that might have educated the world about the truth of what happened in Germany (and Russia).

The thought of living near a registered sex offender can be frightening, especially if you have young children. Some people are hoping the Supreme Court will support a law that will help keep sexual offenders out of their neighborhoods.

Civil Commitment is a law that gives every state the option to keep sexual offenders in custody after they have finished serving a prison sentence.

The offender is taken to a high security mental hospital immediately after their release. This could be a way to keep violent sexual offenders out of society indefinitely.

Members of the Supreme Court declared Civil Commitment to be Constitutional as long as the goal is to treat patients, not inflict punishment. Any state may choose to enforce this, and on January 12, 2010, the Supreme Court heard a case that called for the commencement of Civil Commitment on a Federal level.

As of 2010, nearly 20 states utilize Civil Commitment.

Currently, there are about 4,000 convicted pedophiles, rapists and other offenders confined in state-run mental facilities. Some of this is due to the efforts of a man named Martin Andrews, virginia Crime, .

When Andrews was only 13-years-old, he was approached by a stranger named Richard Ausley, who offered the boy money in exchange, virginia Crime, for help moving furniture. Ausley coaxed Andrews into his van, and drove deep into the country.

For the next several days, Martin Andrews was chained up inside a small metal box.

He was beaten and savagely raped, then left to die in the wilderness. Andrews’ screams for help would have been in vain, but, virginia Crime, a group of hunters heard and followed the young boy’s cries.

Richard Ausley was arrested, tried and convicted for this heinous crime. This was not the first time he had been found guilty of a violent act. Ausley had two prior convictions for sexually assaulting young boys, and yet he was a free man in 1973 when he met Martin Andrews.

By 1999, Ausley had been incarcerated for 29 years and was going to be set free.

Martin Andrews heard about his release date, and decided to do something about it. Andrews acted quickly: he lobbied lawmakers to fund a program that would examine convicted sexual offenders and determine if they should also be subjected to Civil Commitment.

Andrews was successful. Virginia lawmakers backed his cause, and began enforcing Civil Commitment laws. The man who had tormented Andrews would not be set free.

Although Andrews agrees that Civil Commitment is not the best possible system for dealing with sexual offenders, he strongly advocates the law and says that it is “the only tool we have that is 100 percent effective, because they (sexual offenders) are removed from society.

” His goal is to help, virginia Crime, prevent other children from experiencing the torture he endured at the tender age of 13.

Education is a powerful tool, and it can help people protect themselves and keep their families safe. Anyone, virginia Crime, who is concerned about living or working near registered offenders can consider signing up for a free Sexual Offender Alert Program. These programs provide photos, addresses and descriptions of offenses, and allow you to search by name, city or zip code.

Whether or not Civil Commitment will be enforced on a federal level remains to be seen.